Validating the anatomical landmark technique for bedside tunneled central venous catheter placement in the medical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: A non-tunneled dialysis catheter (nTDC) is often the vascular access of choice to initiate dialysis in an intensive care unit (ICU). In the absence of contraindications, if a patient remains dialysis dependent beyond 2-weeks, the options are either to replace the nTDC with another nTDC or convert to a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC). As a standard of care, TDCs are placed under fluoroscopic guidance. OBJECTIVES: To determine if TDCs and other tunneled central venous catheters (tCVC) can be placed safely using anatomical landmark techniques without the use of fluoroscopy. RESEARCH DESIGN: Subjects that met a predetermined selection criteria underwent placement of tunneled catheters with the use of the anatomical landmark technique. We looked at various outcomes to determine the safety and effectiveness of this technique. SUBJECTS: One hundred eleven TDCs and other tCVCs were placed using the anatomical landmark technique in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: All but one (110/111) of the catheters placed had recommended tip placement confirmed by at least one blinded physician. Major complications encountered were bleeding (two cases), pneumothorax (one case), and line associated blood stream infection (one case). We did find a higher-than-expected rate of "unnecessary procedures" with 18/111 lines placed in patients who did not survive beyond 7 days after placement of the catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Using the anatomical landmark technique for bedside tunneled catheter placement can be an effective approach in the right population.

Treatment and practical considerations of diabetic kidney disease.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a complication of diabetes that can lead to kidney failure. Over the years, several drugs have been developed to combat this disease. In the early 90s, angiotensin blockade (ACEi and ARBs) was introduced, which revolutionized the treatment of DKD. In recent years, newer drugs such as sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, endothelin antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) have shown great promise in reducing albuminuria and protecting the kidneys. These drugs are being used in combination with lifestyle modifications, patient education, and risk factor modification to effectively manage DKD. In this review, we will explore the latest pharmacological options, their efficacy, and their potential to revolutionize the management of this debilitating disease.

Genetic Susceptibility to Chronic Kidney Disease: Links, Risks and Management.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. In recent years, our understanding of genetic causes of CKD has expanded significantly with several renal conditions having been identified. This review discusses the current landscape of genetic kidney disease and their potential treatment options. This review will focus on cystic kidney disease, glomerular disease with genetic associations, congenital anomalies of kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT), autosomal dominant-tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD), inherited nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis.

Therapeutic Advances in Diabetic Nephropathy.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States. Risk factor modification, such as tight control of blood glucose, management of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade have been proven to help delay the progression of DKD. In recent years, new therapeutics including sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, endothelin antagonists, glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), have provided additional treatment options for patients with DKD. This review discusses the various treatment options available to treat patients with diabetic kidney disease.

The Cleveland Clinic Kidney Biopsy Epidemiological Project.

Background: The kidney biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing glomerular diseases. Large-scale, epidemiologic studies describing the prevalence of kidney diseases are lacking, especially in the United States. We aimed to determine the spectrum of biopsy-proven kidney disease across the Cleveland Clinic enterprise. Methods: We identified all patients with a native kidney biopsy performed or reviewed at the Cleveland Clinic from January 2015 to September 2021. Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain clinical and demographic characteristics. Results were stratified by age, sex, race, and location to determine epidemiologic trends. Results: Of >9600 patients, we excluded transplant and donor biopsies and unavailable records, and included 4128 patients with native kidney biopsy data. The median age was 60 years, with 46% female patients. Self-reported racial demographics included 73% White, 22% Black, 3% multiracial, and 2% Asian background, with 5% Hispanic. Common diagnoses were: FSGS (n=633, 15%), diabetic kidney disease (DKD) (n=602, 15%), IgA nephropathy (n=319, 8%), lupus nephritis (LN) (n=289, 7%), pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (n=275, 7%), membranous nephropathy (n=211, 5%), and amyloidosis (n=110, 3%). There were 3322 patients in Ohio, with 361 patients in Florida. Using multivariate analysis, those aged >70 years were more likely to have FSGS, whereas those <45 years were more likely to have IgA nephropathy or LN. Males were more likely to have FSGS or IgAN, and less likely to have LN. Black patients were more likely to have FSGS, DKD, or LN. Hispanic patients were more likely to have DKD. Finally, patients in Florida were more likely to have LN. There was no change in the disease spectrum before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Our study catalogs the spectrum of biopsy-proven kidney disease across the Cleveland Clinic enterprise. This lays the foundation for glomerular disease clinical trials, and highlights the need for a standardized national kidney biopsy registry to bolster glomerular and kidney disease research in the United States.

The h-index for associate and full professors of dermatology in the United States: an epidemiologic study of scholastic production.

Promotion in academic dermatology requires evidence of scholastic production. The h-index is a bibliometric measure that combines both volume and impact of scientific contributions. Its calculation better predicts future scientific success than do publication or citation counts. In this epidemiologic survey of associate and full professors of dermatology in residency training programs in the United States, we measured mean and median h-indices among associate and full professors as well as regional differences in h-index. These findings could be used to track individual achievement and as a parameter in considering an individual for professional advancement in dermatology.